Guides
Comparing two offers when every number disagrees with the others
Two real $60,000 offers priced four different ways. One wins on total dollars, the other wins on rate, monthly strain and cost per month. Here is how to choose.
Two offers for the same $60,000 will almost never be quoted on the same scale. One is a factor over six months, the other is a factor over twelve, the fees are different, and the payment frequencies do not match. Before you can pick, you have to rewrite both onto one line. Here is exactly how.
The uncomfortable part is that when you do the work properly, the offers often disagree with themselves. The cheaper offer in total dollars can be the more expensive one per month of use, and the one with the lower rate can be the one that costs you more overall. Both of those things are true in the worked example below.
Normalize four numbers first
Ignore everything on the term sheet except these four. Everything else is commentary until you have them.
- Net proceeds
- The dollars that actually land in your account, after every fee taken off the top. Not the approval amount.
- Total payback
- Every dollar that will leave your account, including per payment ACH fees if the deal charges them.
- Term in calendar days
- Not months, not business days. Days, so two different payment frequencies can be compared.
- Payment and frequency
- The exact dollar amount and how often. This is the affordability number, and it is separate from price.
With those four you can compute every metric that matters in under two minutes. Without them you are comparing marketing. If a term sheet is missing any of the four, see reading a term sheet before going further.
Two real offers on the same $60,000
Both of these are ordinary offers on the same file. Neither one is a trap. They are just structured differently, and the difference is worth roughly $11,000.
| Offer A | Offer B | |
|---|---|---|
| Approved amount | $60,000 | $60,000 |
| Fees off the top | 2 percent, $1,200 | 4 percent, $2,400 |
| Net proceeds to you | $58,800 | $57,600 |
| Factor rate | 1.18 | 1.34 |
| Total payback | $70,800 | $80,400 |
| Payment | $544.62 per business day | $308.05 per business day |
| Payments and term | 130 payments, about 6 months | 261 payments, about 12 months |
| Monthly cash out | $11,818 | $6,685 |
| Total cost including fees | $12,000 | $22,800 |
| Approximate APR | 76.4 percent | 70.7 percent |
| Cost per $1,000 per month | $34.01 | $32.99 |
Four metrics, three different winners
This is the part nobody explains, so read it slowly. The four honest ways to score these offers do not agree, and each one is answering a different question.
- Total dollars out the door. Offer A costs $12,000, Offer B costs $22,800. A wins by $10,800, and this is the only metric most owners ever look at. It answers: how much money will I have given up when this is over?
- APR. A is 76.4 percent, B is 70.7 percent. B wins. This answers: which one charges more per dollar per unit of time? B costs more in total because you keep the money twice as long, not because it is priced worse.
- Cost per $1,000 per month. A is $34.01, B is $32.99. B wins again, and by the same logic. This is the most intuitive version of APR and it is easy to compute: total cost, divided by net proceeds in thousands, divided by months.
- Monthly cash strain. A takes $11,818 a month, B takes $6,685. B wins by a mile. This answers the only question that can actually end your business, which is whether you can pay it.
So A wins on the metric everyone checks and loses on the three that decide whether the deal works. That is not a coincidence. Short terms make the total dollar cost look small, which is precisely why they are quoted that way. See factor rate to APR for why a shorter term at the same price is a higher rate, not a lower one.
The renewal question, which decides it
Here is the test that settles most of these comparisons. Ask yourself honestly: in month seven, will I need capital again?
If the answer is no, Offer A is genuinely cheaper. You will have paid $12,000, you will be free in six months, and you will have $10,800 that Offer B's borrower does not have.
If the answer is yes, and for most businesses taking working capital the answer is yes, then A is not a six month deal. It is a six month deal followed by a renewal, which means another $1,200 of fees and another $10,800 of cost. Run it out to twelve months and A costs $24,000 against B's $22,800, with far more cash strain along the way.
The chart makes the trap visible. A looks cheaper right up until month seven, when the renewal fees reset and the line jumps above B and never comes back down. This is the single most common way owners overpay while believing they chose the cheap option.
The lines with no number on them
Once the arithmetic is done, two offers within a few points of each other are effectively tied on price, and the decision moves to terms. These are the ones that have actually changed our recommendation on real files.
- Early payoff. A written discount schedule can be worth more than ten points of factor, because it turns a fixed cost into one you can shorten. Without it, paying early saves nothing. See prepayment and early payoff.
- Reconciliation. Can you actually get the payment reduced in a bad month, what triggers it, and what do you have to submit? A right you cannot practically invoke is decoration.
- Additional financing clause. If one offer permits an equipment loan later and the other makes it an event of default, that is a real constraint on the next twelve months of your business.
- Guarantee scope. A performance guarantee and a full personal guarantee are one word apart in the document. Only one of them puts your house in the conversation.
- Renewal policy in writing. Ask both funders what happens at 50 percent paid. A funder who will renew at the original factor is worth several points over one who reprices.
- Who holds the paper. A funder who syndicates your deal across investors is harder to reach when you need reconciliation than one holding it on balance sheet.
The two minute worksheet
Do this for every offer, in this order, on one page. If the offers are within about five points of each other on line six, treat them as tied and decide on terms and cash flow instead.
- Write down the net proceeds, not the approval amount.
- Write down the total payback, including per payment fees.
- Subtract: that is your true cost in dollars.
- Write down the term in calendar days, and divide by 365 for the term in years.
- Divide the cost by 55 percent of the net proceeds, then by the term in years. That is your approximate APR.
- Divide the cost by the net proceeds in thousands, then by the term in months. That is your cost per $1,000 per month.
- Divide the monthly payment into your free monthly cash. If it is above 60 percent, the offer is too big regardless of price.
- Ask both funders the six questions on the term sheet page and compare the answers, not the offers.
The cheapest offer on paper and the offer you can survive are different offers more often than anyone selling one will tell you.
What we do with this
Exp Capital Solutions is a broker. We do not fund, price, or approve anything. When a file generates several offers, we rewrite every one onto the same page in the format above: net proceeds, total payback, cost, APR, cost per $1,000 per month, monthly debit against your free cash, and the three clauses most likely to matter. Then we tell you which one we would take and why, including when the answer is the smaller offer that pays us less, or a line of credit that pays us least of all. If you want to know what we earn on each option, ask. We will tell you, and it should be part of how you compare them. See broker versus direct lender.