Guides
What an underwriter is actually trying to answer about you
The five questions behind every credit decision, a scorecard with real thresholds, the seven automatic declines, and how to answer the questions before they are asked.
An underwriter is not grading your business. They are answering five questions, in order, and stopping as soon as one of them comes back wrong. Understanding which five, and what evidence answers each, is the difference between a file that funds in a day and a file that dies in stipulations.
None of this is mysterious. Working capital underwriting is a fast, pattern driven process run by people who read a hundred files a week. They are looking for specific things in a specific order, and almost every decline we see traces back to one of five answers being missing rather than bad.
The five questions, in order
- 01Is this a real operating business?
Entity active and in good standing with the state, EIN matching the legal name, a business bank account with history, a verifiable address and phone, and a license if the industry requires one. This is the KYB layer and it is binary. A dissolved entity ends the file before revenue is ever read.
- 02Is the revenue real and repeatable?
Deposits that look like customers paying, not transfers moving. Enough separate deposits to read as an operating business. No single customer carrying an outsized share. Consistency across three months, not one strong month propping up two weak ones.
- 03Can the cash flow carry this specific payment?
Not can you afford debt in general. Can you afford $656 every business day starting Monday. That is a balance question more than a revenue question, and it is where most files are sized down rather than declined.
- 04If it stops paying, what is there?
Position relative to other filings, the security interest, whether the guarantee is a performance guarantee or a full one, and what enforcement looks like in your state. This question sets the price more than it sets the answer.
- 05Is anyone misrepresenting anything?
Application against statements, statements against a live bank read, stated positions against UCC filings and recurring debits. One unexplained inconsistency turns a fast approval into a manual review. Two ends it.
The scorecard, with real thresholds
Every funder runs a slightly different box, so treat these as the working ranges we see across partners rather than a rule book. What is consistent is which lines carry weight.
| Line | Funds easily | Funds with conditions | Hard to place |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time in business | 2 years or more | 6 to 24 months | Under 6 months |
| Average monthly revenue | $50,000 and up | $15,000 to $50,000 | Under $10,000 |
| Average daily balance | 6 percent of revenue or more | 3 to 6 percent | Under 2 percent |
| Deposits per month | 15 or more | 6 to 15 | Fewer than 5 |
| Negative days per month | 0 to 1 | 2 to 4 | 5 or more |
| NSF items per month | 0 | 1 to 3 | 4 or more |
| Personal credit score | 680 and up | 550 to 680 | Under 500 |
| Open funding positions | None | One | Two or more |
| Largest customer share | Under 20 percent | 20 to 40 percent | Over 50 percent |
| Entity status | Active, good standing | Recently reinstated | Administratively dissolved |
Read that table across, not down. A single column of weak answers is a decline. One weak line surrounded by strong ones is a pricing adjustment, and often not even that. A business with a 540 credit score, two years of history, a 7 percent balance ratio and zero NSF items funds comfortably, because credit is the fourth question, not the first. See credit score requirements for how little it usually carries here.
Seven things that stop a file cold
These are different from weak lines. They are not priced around, they are not negotiated, and no amount of revenue fixes them.
- An open bankruptcy. Discharged is a conversation. Open is a stop, at every funder, in every industry.
- An entity not in good standing. If the state shows administratively dissolved, nothing proceeds until reinstatement is filed and shown. See certificate of good standing.
- Altered or fabricated documents. Retyped statements, edited PDFs, invented invoices. This is fraud, it is caught by comparison against a live bank read, and it follows the file across funders permanently.
- No business bank account. Personal account deposits do not underwrite. This alone excludes a surprising number of otherwise fundable businesses.
- A restricted industry for that funder. Every funder maintains a list. This is not a judgment about you, and the same file often places easily one desk over.
- An OFAC or fraud database hit. Automatic, and appealed with documents rather than argument.
- Undisclosed open positions found during verification. The position itself is survivable. Being caught omitting it is not, because it changes the answer to question five.
There are three outcomes, not two
Owners tend to imagine underwriting as a yes or a no. In practice the most common result by a wide margin is the third one: approved for less than you asked for, on a shorter term, at a higher price than the opening indication. That is not a rejection with better manners. It is the underwriter answering question three and concluding that the cash flow supports $45,000 rather than the $100,000 on the application.
This matters because a sized down offer is negotiable in ways a decline is not. If the cut came from a thin balance, sixty days of change can move it. If it came from a single concentrated customer, a contract can move it. If it came from an open position, a payoff letter can move it. Ask which line drove the reduction. Underwriters will usually tell a broker directly, and the answer is specific rather than general nearly every time.
The other thing worth knowing is that the decision itself is fast. A complete working capital file is typically read and scored inside twenty minutes. Everything that takes days after that is verification and stipulations, which is to say it is time spent collecting things that could have been in the original submission. Speed in this market is almost entirely a function of how complete the first email was.
What is explainable, and how to explain it
Most weak lines have a real story behind them, and a story submitted up front is worth far more than the same story dragged out during stipulations two days later. Attach the evidence, not the explanation.
- One bad month in three
- A short cover note plus the same month from last year, showing it is seasonal rather than declining.
- An open tax lien
- The IRS or state payment plan agreement and the last two proof of payment receipts. A lien with a documented plan is fundable at most desks.
- A large one off deposit
- The invoice or contract behind it, so it is credited as revenue rather than stripped as a transfer.
- Customer concentration
- The signed contract or the term of the relationship. Two years with one customer reads very differently from one big order.
- A position you just cleared
- The payoff letter. Without it, the debits on your statements read as still open.
- A recent charge off or judgment
- A one paragraph note with dates and current status. Old and resolved is fine. Unexplained is not.
- Multiple bank accounts
- Send them all unprompted. Transfers between your own accounts get found and questioned every single time.
What a strong file looks like by product
The five questions are constant. The evidence bar moves enormously by product, and choosing the wrong product for your file is a more common failure than being genuinely unfundable.
An advance asks for three months of statements and a one page application. A term loan adds tax returns, a profit and loss statement and a debt schedule. An SBA 7(a) adds personal financial statements, two to three years of business and personal returns, projections, and a use of funds statement, which is why it takes 30 to 90 days and costs a fraction as much.
The pattern is consistent: every step down the ladder buys speed and pays for it in price. A file with two years of history, clean statements and a 700 score can access all six products, and taking the fastest one costs multiples of what the slowest one would. A file with eight months of history and a 560 score can access the top two, and for that owner an advance is not the expensive option, it is the only option. Knowing which of those two situations you are in is most of the decision.
Almost nobody is unfundable. Plenty of people are applying to the wrong product with the right file.
Answer the questions before they are asked
- Send complete PDF statements from online banking, every page, every account, before anyone asks for the second one.
- Round revenue down on the application so the statements can only surprise upward.
- Disclose every open position with the payment amount and the funder name. It is on the statements anyway.
- Include the entity documents up front: EIN letter, articles, and proof of good standing if your state charges nothing to pull it.
- Write two sentences about anything unusual in the last ninety days. Two sentences up front replaces two days of back and forth.
- Fix the bank statements first if the balance ratio is under 3 percent. Sixty days of change is worth more than any amount of packaging. See average daily balance.
What we do with this
Exp Capital Solutions is a broker. We do not underwrite, approve or price anything. What we do is run your file through these five questions before it leaves our desk, tell you which answers are weak, and gather the evidence for the weak ones in advance so the funder never has to ask. Then we send it only to partners whose box actually fits, rather than blasting it everywhere, because a file shopped to twelve desks prices worse than a file placed at two. When the honest answer is that the file needs sixty days rather than another submission, we say that. See how to qualify for what those sixty days should contain.